Fiber Direkt

We look at your infrastructure the way we look at our own

Most cybersecurity analyses start with the frameworks. We start with you. A resilience analysis gives you a concrete picture of where you are, what is actually going on, and what to do about it within 90 days.

Certifications and jurisdiction

  • ISO 27001Information security
  • ISO 14001Environmental management
  • Swedish ownershipOwned and operated in Sweden

Resilience analysis Module 1, Foundation sprint

Three weeks, six domains, one concrete 90-day plan. No frameworks for the sake of frameworks.

See the approach

Module 1, Foundation sprint

Six domains, three weeks, a 90-day plan

6Domains in a focused review
2–3Weeks from start to final delivery
90Days: a prioritised action plan

Domains in focus

Plain language first, technical term in brackets. We go deep on what matters and on what we can verify.

What the outside world sees

External attack surface. DNS, MX records, exposed services, certificate hygiene, public IP allocations. Passive analysis only.

Domain01

Your connection to the world

Transit and connectivity. Internet transit redundancy, BGP, fibre path diversity. Weaknesses in the network topology.

Domain02

Identity and access

IAM. MFA coverage, privileged accounts, joiner-mover-leaver. Service accounts to managed identities.

Domain03

Ability to recover

Recovery. Tested backup, documented RTO, scheduled quarterly restores of the top 3 systems.

Domain04

The findings table

What the findings table looks like

Six representative findings from a typical Foundation sprint. Ranked by risk times effort. P1/P2 classification for priority, S/M/L for effort, indicative cost in the description.

  • Priority · HighEffort · Medium

    Single transit at the primary site

    All external traffic goes through one ISP. The AS path has no redundancy. A 30-minute outage stops email, VPN and the customer-facing portal. Add secondary transit with an alternative carrier. Configure BGP failover. Indicative cost: approx. SEK 25k/month.

  • Priority · HighEffort · Small

    Backup not tested for 14 months

    Backup jobs run and report green. Last verified full restore: 2025-02. Restore time unknown. Scheduled quarterly restores of the top 3 systems. Documented RTO. Indicative cost: approx. 8 hours of internal work.

  • Priority · HighEffort · Small

    MFA missing on 4 administrative accounts

    Two service accounts and two privileged user accounts in Entra without enforced MFA. The accounts have global admin rights. Enforce MFA. Convert service accounts to managed identities. Indicative cost: approx. 4 hours of internal work.

  • Priority · MediumEffort · Small

    SPF and DKIM in place, DMARC is p=none

    The email domain authenticates correctly, but DMARC is in a passive policy. Risk of spoofed customer communications. Move step by step from p=none to quarantine to reject over 60 days. Monitor the reports. Indicative cost: approx. 12 hours of internal work.

  • Priority · MediumEffort · Large

    Identity and email in the same jurisdiction

    Entra ID and Microsoft 365 are both under US law. Customer contracts place growing demands on data localisation. A dependency map (Module 2) is recommended. Indicative 12-month migration window.

  • Priority · LowEffort · Medium

    No joiner-mover-leaver review

    Manual offboarding routines, no automated checks. Risk of lingering access. Joiner, mover and leaver review. Automated deprovisioning in Entra with quarterly attestation.

Plan

The 90-day plan

The most important part of the document. If management reads only two pages, they read the summary and this one.

Bucket 1

This week

  • Enable MFA on four administrative accounts (4 h)
  • Remove three leftover accounts from offboarding (1 h)
  • Schedule a restore test of customer-facing systems (planning)

Bucket 2

This month

  • Run the restore test, measure RTO, document
  • Start the DMARC move from p=none → quarantine
  • Joiner, mover and leaver review in Entra ID
  • Convert service accounts to managed identities
  • Request quotes for secondary transit (2 to 3 carriers)

Bucket 3

This quarter

  • Implement secondary transit and BGP failover
  • Complete the DMARC reject policy
  • Dependency map (Module 2), scope the identity migration window
  • Make quarterly restore testing a routine

The journey

Build as far as it is worth it

Resilience analysis is a structured, modular journey. Every module has a fixed, clear scope. We build resilience at the pace and scale you want to invest in, from the first half-day to an ongoing resilience partnership. It has to work for both sides.

Situation overview

A half-day conversation, one page back within a working week.

1 page within 1 week

SEK 0 to 10k

Foundation sprint

Six-domain technical review, with a real restore.

2 to 3 weeks

SEK 60 to 120k

Dependency map

Dependencies, jurisdiction, sovereignty.

3 to 4 weeks

SEK 80 to 150k

Compliance

NIS2, CRA and GDPR, operational rather than legal.

4 to 6 weeks

SEK 150 to 300k

Resilience partner

An ongoing counterpart, on a monthly retainer.

Ongoing

SEK 15 to 40k/month

The final report in four parts

Summary

A one-page situation overview, with the most important points first. Written in plain language, with the technical term in brackets where needed.

Prioritised findings table

Everything we found, ranked by risk times effort. P1 / P2 classification, effort in S / M / L, indicative cost per action.

90-day plan

Week, month, quarter. Who does what, when, and what it takes. Ready to act on, not a strategy document.

Dependencies and risks

What the next step looks like if you want to go deeper. Dependency map, jurisdiction analysis, regulatory consequences: what is worth looking at in Module 2.

The document

This is what it looks like

One page, two at most. Delivered within 5 working days. Here is a representative extract.

Situation overview, Briefing

2026-04-29Participants: 5Confidential

Resilience picture, Hagaby Industri AB

What we heard

Hagaby Industri makes specialised ventilation components and sells to the construction and property sector in the Nordics. It has around 140 employees across its head office and production in Småland and a distribution warehouse in Mälardalen. The business relies heavily on the ERP system IFS Cloud, which runs orders, invoicing and production planning. Backups run, but the last verified restore was done during the 2024 migration. The IT lead has been in the role since January 2026 and is mapping what they inherited.

The three biggest resilience risks

01, ERP and email with the same supplier.

IFS Cloud and Microsoft 365 are both hosted by a US hyperscaler. When the supplier had disruptions in 2025, orders, invoicing and communication stopped at the same time. There is no out-of-band channel to customers.

02, ERP restore is unverified.

IFS backups report green, but the last verified full restore was 19 months ago. RTO is undocumented. A backup that hasn't been tested doesn't exist.

03, End-of-life control systems on the production line.

Three PLC controllers have lost supplier support since 2024 and receive no security updates. They are on the same VLAN as the administrative clients, so a compromise on the office side reaches production.

What "good" looks like

You can handle a four-hour ERP outage without stopping packing or deliveries to customers. ERP restore is documented, rehearsed within 12 months and meets an RTO of eight hours at most. The production line sits on its own VLAN, with no direct access from the administrative network.

Recommended next step

We recommend a Foundation sprint, scoped to the three points above. Indicatively SEK 80k over three weeks. A detailed proposal is attached.

Ready to see your resilience?

A half-day situation overview, free of charge. We'll come back to you with one page within a working week.